All insights

How is the clean energy lending market evolving in 2025?

November 7, 2025

Project finance lending to clean energy technologies grew by 7.6% in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period last year. Our research estimates that more than $86 billion in debt financing went to support both mature technologies such as wind and solar as well as an expanding list of newly eligible and emerging technologies, such as advanced manufacturing, nuclear, clean fuels, and geothermal. 

The growth in project lending reflects a growing and maturing market, driven by rapid load growth, investor demand for clean energy project exposure, tax credit availability, and an evolution among lenders to serve more technologies and sponsor types. 

Estimated total project finance (all sources) and lending to clean energy, through 1H2025

Source: The State of Clean Energy Finance: 2025 Mid-Year Market Intelligence Report

The cost of capital by debt type

Clean energy projects utilize several types of capital to fund their development, construction, and operation. These include tax equity, preferred equity, project equity, transferable tax credits, and several varieties of debt financing:

  • Pre-NTP (notice-to-proceed) debt finances pre-construction activities, such as permitting, interconnection agreements, and equipment purchases.
  • Bridge loans serve as a financing “bridge” before tax equity or transferable tax credits can be monetized.
  • Construction loans, as the name suggests, provide financing to build a project.
  • Term debt funds a project once it is operational. 

Projects combine these sources of funding into a capital stack. Pricing for each funding source is based on a project’s technology, type, revenue model, and the credit quality of the sponsor. 

For debt financing, lenders price loans as a spread over two benchmark rates: the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) or five-year US Treasuries. As of September 2025, the SOFR was 4.35% and five-year US Treasuries were 3.73%. The actual spread above these benchmarks varies significantly based on project type. 

According to Crux’s mid-year market report, fully contracted, utility-scale solar and wind projects developed by sponsors with established track records can secure construction loans at spreads of just 150 basis points (bps) over SOFR — meaning a total of 5.85%. By contrast, projects with emerging technologies, a merchant revenue model, or sponsors with less experience could expect spreads between 300 and 1,000 basis points. 

Pricing trends and drivers related to each loan type varied in the first half of 2025:

Pre-NTP development capital

According to data from New Project Media, pre-NTP funding surpassed $7 billion in the first half of 2025. One factor driving this level of funding is regulatory changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) that accelerated the timelines developers must follow to maintain eligibility for wind and solar tax credits. 

Under the OBBB, wind and solar projects must meet commence-construction requirements before July 4, 2026 to be eligible for the §45Y or §48E tax credit. The legislation likely drove an increase in equipment financing needs for purchases of wind turbines, solar panels, and other equipment.

Pre-NTP development capital costs are shaped in large part by the fact that they come with some inherent risk. Pre-NTP capital finances project steps that must be completed before a project can be built. In the first half of 2025, that meant:

  • Pricing spreads ranged from SOFR + 350 to 650 basis points. Borrowers with stronger balance sheets and diversified portfolios received cheaper loans.
  • Lenders favored diversified portfolios and collateral packages, including revenue-generating assets or parent guarantees.
  • Growing participation of private credit funds, ESG-oriented lenders, and family offices in the first half of 2025 is a sign of increasing pre-NTP market maturity. The participation of these institutions also helped offset some of the pricing impact of policy uncertainty.

Bridge loans

Bridge loans provide short-term financing to cover a project’s capital needs before a range of committed funds — from tax equity and transferable tax credits to preferred equity — become available. This funding is important because tax credit proceeds are only available once projects are operational. Bridge loan types include:

  • Tax equity bridge loans (TEBLs) provide funds to developers before an expected tax equity investment. TEBLs are advanced only when an investment commitment has been made.
  • Preferred equity bridge loans (PEBLs) are also advanced when an investment commitment has been made. These loans provide financing that bridges a project to a preferred equity investment. At that point, the project sponsor maintains control of the project while the investor takes a priority return position.
  • Transfer credit bridge loans (TCBRs) are the only type of bridge loan that can be advanced when there is no investment commitment because the tax credit transfer market has sufficient liquidity to facilitate a transfer without a pre-arranged counterparty.

In the first half of 2025, the pricing for bridge loans was most attractive when a firm commitment from an investor was in place. Loans backed by committed tax credit purchase agreements, tax equity term sheets, and preferred equity investments received the most favorable terms. Loan advance rates ranged from between 60% and 98% of expected proceeds, and prices ranged from SOFR + 200 to 750 basis points, with those that had investment-grade counterparties receiving the most favorable terms.

Range of committed bridge loan yield by advance rate

Source: The State of Clean Energy Finance: 2025 Mid-Year Market Intelligence Report

The perceived higher risk of uncommitted projects was reflected in pricing. Uncommitted bridge loan pricing ranged between SOFR + 500 and 1,000 basis points. Advance rates were also lower, at between 60% and 90% of expected proceeds.

Advance rates for uncommitted bridge loans

Source: The State of Clean Energy Finance: 2025 Mid-Year Market Intelligence Report

Construction debt 

Construction debt provides the capital needed to transform blueprints, permits, interconnection agreements, and other development activity into power plants generating electricity and factories manufacturing clean energy components. 

Construction loans are short-term loans and cover the financing needs from groundbreaking until commercial operations. Construction loan dynamics in the first half of 2025 were characterized by:

  • Stable pricing. Even amid significant policy uncertainty in the first half of 2025, lenders viewed construction debt as relatively low risk because projects already have engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts. 
  • Pricing contained by competition. Increased competition among banks and other lenders helped prevent price spikes. For investment-grade sponsors, prices ranged between SOFR + 250 and 450 basis points and SOFR + 400 to 600 basis points for mid-market developers.
  • Advance rates driven by technology type. More mature technologies with offtake agreements received more generous advance rates — which ranged between 75% of project costs for emerging technologies and 90% for well-established technologies.

Representative construction yield ranges for energy and manufacturing projects

Source: The State of Clean Energy Finance: 2025 Mid-Year Market Intelligence Report

Term debt 

Term debt provides funding once a project begins operation. Term debt replaces construction loans and can lock in longer-term, lower-cost capital while also enabling developers to recycle capital to invest in new projects.

Term debt is the cheapest source of capital in the project finance debt stack. Pricing is driven by offtake agreements and the credit profile of borrowers:

  • 83% of respondents to a Crux survey said they would lend to fully contracted projects.
  • Only 25% were willing to lend to partially contracted or merchant projects.
  • Pricing for fully contracted, high-quality projects ranged from SOFR + 150 to 350 basis points and had maturities between 5 and 20 years.

Go deeper: Download “Financing the Future: Lending Dynamics in US Energy and Manufacturing”

Key takeaways for clean energy developers

All things being equal, the lending market in the first half of 2025 was more liquid for fully contracted projects given the reduced risk associated with cash flow predictability. Over time, however, lenders have shown more willingness to allocate capital to partially contracted projects due to increased investor sophistication around project end-markets and technological maturity. 

The growth and liquidity of the tax credit market has also helped lenders underwrite loans to projects with merchant revenues, reflecting confidence that the tax credit can be monetized at a reasonably predictable price. However, capital allocated to invest in merchant projects is typically at a lower total dollar volume and higher cost compared to that for fully contracted projects.

Crux’s full market intelligence updates — including deeper explorations of trends in the debt and tax equity markets and tax credit pricing by technology types — are available exclusively to Crux clients. Contact us to learn more about accessing our market insights and technology-enabled debt capital markets platform.

Ready to join Crux?

Get started